Vedi lo schermo del tuo iPhone o iPad direttamente sul tuo computer Mac con la tecnica del mirroring con Reflector 2, ideale per registrare videotutorial. The download from their website was troublesome. Demo With Ease Easily demo iOS apps on any Mac running OS X Lion using AirPlay Mirroring on iOS 5. Reflector 1.6.6 Features Easily demo of iOS apps on any kind of Macintosh personal co AirPlay,Reflector,AirPlay for Mac,Reflector for Mac,Reflector Download, Reflector Free Download, Reflector Full version. Reflector for Mac Os will help you AirPlay mirror up your iPhone or iPad to your Macintosh personal computer. Reflector 1.6.6 Free Download for Mac - AirPlay your iOS device to your Mac. In my opinion it only makes sense to sort by rate if the chosen filters somehow return a set of servers with significantly different bandwidths, some of which are much slower than the user's connection.Processor type(s) & speed: 64-bit processor If the user's bandwidth is already saturated then it makes no difference, and if not then the bandwidth is probably so high that the difference in download time is negligible. That's several GB of data transfer every time just to find the "fastest" mirror. The main abuse of the rating function that I see is rating hundreds of mirrors without first filtering them. Rating mirrors by speed is mostly useful when your bandwidth exceeds the server's bandwidth, but even that is less useful now that we can just increment the number of parallel downloads in Pacman. A Ferrari and a Lada stuck in the same traffic jam will move at the same speed. My point is simply that once a mirror saturates your bandwidth, you simply cannot receive the data any faster no matter how much faster the mirror could serve it. I'm not disparaging your bandwidth at all. In such cases (where the local connection is the bottleneck) just pick mirrors that are good based on other criteria. If the connection from your computer to the wider internet is a massive bottleneck, then rating mirror speed is irrelevant as all attempted measures would be capped by the local connection rather than providing any information about the mirror. The fact that there is a simple option (command line flag) to change this timeout indicates that it is seen as "worth bothering with".ĮDIT: though the comment on a connection that maxes out at 3MB/s could be read differently - but it's still not suggesting that users of such connections are not worth bothering with - but only that there is no point trying to find fast mirrors if the mirrors are not the bottleneck. The defaut timeout is simply the default. No one has suggested any such thing here. What would you recommend people do?ĭo we really live in a world where 1 MB/s (so about 8-10 Mbps, not even speaking about the ludicrous 3 MB/s (!) you mention) is considered too low a bandwidth to bother with? So you feel like people abuse the rate sorting functionality? It is enabled in the Archiso reflector config, and I see it as one of the stronger selling points of the software, but I think I can understand what you mean especially in conjunction with ParallelDownloads (which is disabled by default OTOH). It certainly sounds exaggerated to me to dismiss it as a valid bandwidth threshold for general computing since I do torrents and other large transfers on it, but anyway I'm digressing. Slightly tangential, but do we really live in a world where 1 MB/s (so about 8-10 Mbps, not even speaking about the ludicrous 3 MB/s (!) you mention) is considered too low a bandwidth to bother with? It was only a few years ago when I was delighted to reach those heights, because it meant I could stream a 720p movie without worrying too much about buffering. If pacman has even just a 10s timeout delay, that would explain the difference in behaviour I observed. But your math checks out and it does explain why only community.db is affected. I was operating under the assumption that the "download timed out" message meant the connection had failed/broken up, but hadn't considered the 5s delay applied to the allotted time to download a file from the servers. That's why to me it feels like there is a certain something specific to reflector which triggers those failures, but I don't know enough to say what. I am tethered to my phone so it certainly isn't the greatest connection, but despite all the warnings I get between 1 and 3 MB/s downloads with pacman and no repo/package download failure. # With: reflector -country France,Germany -latest 5 -protocol https -sort rateĪs you can see from the timestamps it took quite a while in between errors. # Arch Linux mirrorlist generated by Reflector # WARNING: failed to rate http(s) download (): Download timed out after 5 second(s).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |